Tailgating One Oh! One
This is one of the first large tailgating operations I came across. They asked if I wanted to try some of the food, and I politely declined, but once they found out I was from New Mexico, they insisted I try one of their breakfast burritos. I was handed a burrito and a beer, but I told the host I didn't drink beer and he said "Great! Gives me a good excuse to have another beer!" This tailgate setup was sponsored by WMC, Inc. an engineering consulting group out of St Louis, I believe, who is opening a branch in Denver. On the menu for free were various burritos, bratwurst, pancakes, hamburgers, eggs cooked to order, beer and an open bar. And the hosts were so gracious and friendly.
I imagined Tailgating to be a process of showing up early to the parking lot of a football stadium before a game, pulling out coolers and hanging out around the coolers drinking whatever beverages are allowed, and whooping it up a little in preparation for the game. Not in the least at CU Boulder, as I got a crash course in Tailgating 1 Oh! 1 on Saturday, September 17th when the CU Buffalos faced off against the Northern Colorado Bears.
Basically the whole campus is open for tailgating from a few small groups to large, well organized groups setting up for pre-game festivities. Everything is "Buff" and at first I thought it concerned all the young people with athletic bodies running around, but I was soon set straight that "Buff" is for "Buffalo". They have a live buffalo mascot named Ralphie, who performs at halftime. Besides multiple grills, food warmers, beer on tap, and lots of coolers filled with beverages, each formal and informal tailgate had "Cornhole" boards set up with people trying to toss beanbags through the holes in the boards. I got the complete rules of Cornhole explained while making the rounds.
Besides the various setups in most of the parking lots around campus, Franklin Field outside of Folsom Field Stadium had tents set up for various activities around the perimeter of the field. In a large grassy field in front of the Duane Physics and Astrophysics Building they had tables with umbrellas, a bandstand, a bar, and Ralphie, the buffalo, in a corral. The President of the Regents, I believe, was being introduced while I was wandering around the area. Then I came across the Golden Buffalo Marching band lined up around the Imig Music building, ready to march to the stadium. The band formed a long line as they must of had 200 or more musicians.
Almost everywhere I walked, people stopped me and asked if I was with the Colorado Daily, and then chatted and explained the various activities associated with tailgating, history of the campus, the architectural style, and the buffalo culture. I was offered food and drink at almost every tailgate party where people inquired about who I was with. All the people were very friendly and hospitable. I also ended up talking to different police officers and they said they had a good crowd and that there was rarely any fighting or other serious trouble at the tailgating or the games. Coming from New Mexico, I found it hard to believe they didn't have fights, but I certainly didn't see any hostilities.
The Buffalos lost to the Bears.
Pancakes going on the grill.
Tailgating in style with champagne, salad and steak sandwiches.
One of many Cornhole games with CU boards.
Big screen and tents on Franklin Field.
Virtual Tour of Franklin Field.
Click here to go to the web page with the tour.
Tables on the field with the Duane Physics and Astrophysics Building in the background.
The Buff crew moving Ralphie.
Recording Ralphie.
Golden Buffalo Marching band lined up around the Imig Music Building.
Cheerleaders lined up to lead the march to the stadium.
CU Sousaphones and a little short of Seventy-Six Trombones
A "Lonely Hearts Club" member.
And yet another crowd of tailgaters.
The Buff Bus.
The opposing team.
Party on!
Comments
===========================================================
A closer look
StonkFun in 2026: Understanding the Broader Launchpad Trend is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on what distinguishes an attention-driven launch from a durable community project. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonksfun or stonks xyz, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine what distinguishes an attention-driven launch from a durable community project. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. When searching for explanations, readers may encounter shorthand, misspellings and loosely related names. Search wording should not be treated as proof that two services share operators, contracts or policies. Checking the exact service identity matters more than matching a familiar phrase.
Consider what would falsify a bold claim about careful readers separate protocol design from claims made by individual token promoters. An onchain transfer, a published fee schedule or a consistently observed market event might confirm one narrow statement while leaving the larger conclusion unresolved. That is why reliable educational coverage uses precise language such as “may,” “depends on,” and “subject to current terms” where certainty is not justified.
Implications for users
An often overlooked aspect is onchain activity offers observable transactions but not certainty about value. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. A new token can have an appealing brand and still lack lasting liquidity. The mechanics of creating a market are relatively straightforward compared with sustaining responsible communications, authentic interest and an active community over time.
Important distinctions
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on careful readers separate protocol design from claims made by individual token promoters. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Solana provides the blockchain environment, while Raydium-based infrastructure is used for important parts of the launch and liquidity process. Those components can be visible through transaction records, yet the human questions remain open: who created the coin, why might someone trade it, and what could go wrong if interest disappears?
Closing observations
For a grounded assessment, Onchain activity offers observable transactions but not certainty about value. At the same time, careful readers separate protocol design from claims made by individual token promoters. A search for stonk launch xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
=================================================
A useful starting point
StonkFun Versus Pump.fun: A Conceptual Comparison is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how quote asset flexibility differentiates different launch interfaces. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonfun or stonckfun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
To understand stonkfun versus pump.fun: a conceptual comparison, begin with how quote asset flexibility differentiates different launch interfaces. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. A practical comparison should focus on user-visible mechanisms: which quote tokens are supported, how markets launch, what fees apply, and what happens when initial liquidity moves to a different stage. Brand popularity alone is too narrow a basis for choosing a tool.
In practice
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine both attention and liquidity influence trading after a launch. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Tokenized stocks are a particularly easy topic to misunderstand. A coin quoted in a token linked to an equity is still a separate crypto asset. The legal rights and redemption rules of the quote product require independent analysis, and a trading pair does not confer ordinary shareholder rights.
What to check
An often overlooked aspect is features and fees may evolve, so compare current screens rather than old screenshots. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Safety analysis should include realistic execution conditions. A small headline market capitalization may look attractive, yet it can coexist with a thin pool where even moderate selling causes large slippage. Liquidity can disappear quickly during market stress.
The bigger picture
For a grounded assessment, Both attention and liquidity influence trading after a launch. At the same time, features and fees may evolve, so compare current screens rather than old screenshots. A search for stonks fun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.